On 1 February 2024 E Collars were to be banned in the UK. And then they weren’t! Electronic collars, commonly known as e-collars or shock collars, are training devices designed to deliver an electric shock to a dog as a form of correction. Despite growing awareness of their negative impacts, some trainers continue to use e-collars. In this blog, we’ll explore why e-collars are harmful to dogs and examine the reasons why some trainers persist in using them, including misleading claims about their safety.
Why E-Collars Are Harmful
1. Physical Pain and Discomfort
E-collars administer an electric shock, which can cause physical pain and discomfort to the dog. The sensation can range from mild to severe, depending on the intensity set by the trainer. Even at lower levels, the experience can be distressing and unpleasant for the dog.
2. Fear and Anxiety
The use of e-collars can create fear and anxiety in dogs. When a dog receives a shock, they may associate it with the environment or situation in which it occurred, leading to generalized fear. This can cause anxiety-related behaviours, such as cowering, aggression, or withdrawal, affecting the dog’s overall mental health and behaviour.
3. Risk of Injury
Improper use of e-collars can result in physical injuries, including burns, skin irritation, and damage to the neck area. The electrical stimulation can cause tissue damage if used excessively or at high levels, leading to long-term health issues for the dog.
4. Hindered Learning and Understanding
E-collars rely on aversive stimuli to suppress unwanted behaviours rather than teaching alternative, desirable behaviours. This method does not address the underlying reasons for the behaviour and can impair the dog’s ability to learn and understand commands through positive reinforcement.
5. Undermines the Human-Dog Bond
Training with e-collars can damage the bond between a dog and its owner. The use of pain and discomfort as a training tool can lead to a breakdown in trust and create a relationship based on fear rather than mutual respect and positive reinforcement.
6. Potential for Increased Aggression
Research indicates that the use of aversive training methods like e-collars can increase the likelihood of aggression in dogs. The pain or fear induced by the e-collar can lead to defensive or aggressive responses, particularly if the dog feels threatened or cornered.
Why Some Trainers Still Use E-Collars
1. Perceived Effectiveness
Some trainers believe that e-collars offer a quick and effective solution to unwanted behaviours. They argue that the immediate response to the shock can correct behaviour problems rapidly. This perception of effectiveness, however, often overlooks the long-term negative consequences for the dog.
2. Traditional Training Methods
E-collars are part of traditional training techniques that emphasize control and dominance. Trainers who adhere to these outdated methods may view e-collars as a necessary tool for establishing authority and correcting behaviour, despite the growing evidence of their drawbacks.
3. Lack of Updated Knowledge
In some cases, trainers may continue to use e-collars due to a lack of awareness about more modern, humane training methods. As training techniques evolve, some trainers may not be updated on the latest research and best practices in positive reinforcement.
4. Market Demand and Client Expectations
There may be a market demand or client expectation for quick fixes to behavioural issues. Trainers who face pressure to deliver fast results might use e-collars to meet these demands, even if they are aware of the potential harm associated with their use.
5. Misunderstanding of Training Principles
Some trainers may misunderstand the principles of effective, positive reinforcement-based training. They might believe that e-collars are necessary to correct certain behaviours, without fully grasping the benefits of building positive associations and rewarding desirable actions.
6. Cost and Accessibility
E-collars can be relatively affordable and easily accessible compared to other training tools. For trainers operating on a budget or with limited resources, e-collars may seem like a practical solution despite their ethical and practical shortcomings.
7. Misleading Claims About Safety
Some trainers assert that e-collars are harmless by using them at a low intensity, claiming that they do not hurt when set on a minimal level. They often demonstrate the collar on themselves to show that the sensation is mild. However, this is misleading. The low setting may indeed feel tolerable to humans but can be distressing or even painful for dogs due to their more sensitive nature. Furthermore, if a dog does not respond to the initial low level, trainers often escalate the intensity, increasing the risk of pain and stress. This escalation contradicts claims of safety and demonstrates how the device’s potential for harm can grow with its use.
Conclusion
While e-collars might offer immediate compliance, their use comes with significant risks and drawbacks. The physical pain, fear, and potential for increased aggression far outweigh any short-term benefits. The continued use of e-collars by some trainers reflects a reliance on outdated methods and a lack of awareness of more humane, effective training techniques.
Positive reinforcement training, which focuses on rewarding desirable behaviours and building a trusting relationship between you and your dog, offers a more compassionate and effective alternative. Embracing these modern methods ensures your dog’s well-being and fosters a positive learning environment, ultimately leading to more sustainable and harmonious behaviour change.
Comentários